AquaNIC logo AquaNIC Banner
  Home Ask FAQ Tools About Site Map Non Java Spanish

Add a news item to AquaNIC.  If your item relates to a conference or other scheduled educational activity, then we suggest you check out our calendar.

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

2002

December

  • EPA's notice on the extension of the deadline for public comments on the proposed regulation for
    discharges from aquaculture facilities was published in the Federal Register on December 2.
    Please note the deadline is being extended for about 6 weeks with the new deadline date of
    January 27, 2003. Please review the notice for complete details. You can access the Federal Register notice at the following website address for a PDF copy:
    http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2002/pdf/02-30466.pdf
    [Federal Register: December 2, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 231)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 71523-71524]
    >From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
    [DOCID:fr02de02-4
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 40 CFR Part 451, [FRL-7415-6], RIN 2040-AD55
    Extension of Comment Period for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category; Proposed Rule
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.
    SUMMARY: EPA proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animals Production (CAAP) Category on September 12, 2002. The proposed regulations would apply to discharges from certain facilities in the CAAP Category that grow, contain or produce aquatic animals above 100,000 pounds. EPA is extending the comment period by approximately six weeks. The comment period will now close on January 27, 2003. EPA has carefully considered the court-ordered promulgation date in making the decision to extend the comment period for this rulemaking.
    DATES: Comments regarding the proposed rule will be accepted on or
    before January 27, 2003.
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to W-02-01, Ms. Marta E. Jordan, Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T), U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. For hand-deliveries or Federal
    Express, please send comments to Ms. Marta E. Jordan, Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division, Room 6233M, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 6th Floor, Connecting Wing, Washington, DC 20460. EPA requests an original and three copies of your written comments and enclosures (including copies of references). Comments may be sent by email to the following e-mail address: aquaticanimals@epa.gov.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marta E. Jordan, Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone (202) 566-1049, fax (202) 566-1053.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the CAAP Category on September 12, 2002, see 67 FR 57871. The proposed regulation would apply to producers of aquatic animals which produce at least 100,000 pounds of animals per year in one of three specific production systems. EPA proposed to establish requirements for the production of aquatic animals in flow through, recirculating, and net pen systems. EPA proposes to establish numeric limitations for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in the wastewater discharged from flow through and recirculating systems. EPA also proposes to require the development and implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to
    control the discharge of pollutants from flow through, recirculating and net pens systems. EPA described the bases for these requirements in section VIII of the preamble to the proposed regulation (67 FR 57895).
    EPA held three public meetings to provide an overview of the proposed rule and opportunities for the regulated community and other interested parties to ask questions on issues pertaining to the proposed rule.
    EPA received several requests to extend the comment period to allow more time to address the issues on which EPA solicited public comment. The requests for an extension pointed out that this is a very busy
    season for a large portion of this industry. Many sectors are involved in harvest through the fall months. EPA agrees that many producers may need more time to develop comments to the proposal. The comment period
    for the proposed rule is extended until January 27, 2003. EPA is scheduled to take final action on effluent limitations guidelines and new source performance standards for this industry by June 2004. EPA is using its best efforts to comply with this deadline and expects to meet the schedule even with this extension of the
    comment period.  Dated: November 25, 2002.
    G. Tracy Mehan, III, Assistant Administrator for Water. [FR Doc. 02-30466 Filed 11-29-02; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

     
  • The University of Idaho, Department of Food Science & Toxicology, in conjunction with Idaho
    TechHelp, is planning a Seafood HACCP Workshop the first quarter of 2003 in the Intermountain
    area of the U.S. We are currently looking at the Salt Lake City, Utah, area as a central site to
    serve the needs of companies in Montana, Utah, Colorado, and Idaho. The course will meet the
    training requirements of 21CFR Part123, the FDA seafood HACCP regulation, and we will be
    offering a University of Idaho certificate of completion (CEU's also available), rather than an AFDO
    certificate. The course will be offered in January or February, and will utilize Seafood HACCP Alliance
    curriculum, along with the FDA Hazards and Control Guide for Seafood. The course will be taught
    by Jeff Kronenberg, M.S., who has been conducting HACCP training, auditing HACCP, and
    assisting with HACCP implementation for the last 17 years. If you are interested in attending this course, or have an associate that is looking for this training, please contact myself or Teresa Hicks, U of I conference manager (208 364-4067). We need approximately 15-20 students before we can hold the course. Thank you.

    Jeff Kronenberg, Food Processing Specialist, University of Idaho- TechHelp, Cooperative Extension System,
    Business and Technology Incubator, 1904 E. Chicago, Suite B-3, Caldwell, ID 83605, 208 455-9650 ext. 110
    208 867-6477 (cell), 208 455-9653 (fax), Email: jkron@uidaho.edu, Web: www.techhelp.org www.ag.uidaho.edu/fst/

November

October

  • Secondary and Two-Year Postsecondary Agriculture Education Challenge Grants Program (SPEC)
  • Higher Education Challenge Grants Program (HEC)
  • Higher Education Multicultural Scholars Programs
  • December 1, 2002 is the Deadline for Titles and Abstracts for Paper/Poster submissions for the Symposium on Propagated Fish in Resource Management Symposium that will be held June, 2003 in Boise ID. We encourage everyone who manages, studies or deals with cultured fish and their role in, and impacts on, aquatic ecosystems to consider a contribution to this important Symposium. Details on all aspects of the Symposium, including subject areas for papers and posters, can be found at the website: http://www.fishbiologycongress.org/pfirm
  • M.P. Mulvihill Aquaculture Student Scholarship - The first scholarship for $1,500 will be presented at Aquaculture America 2003 in Louisville, Kentucky to a deserving aquaculture student to help further his/her education.  To be eligible for the M.P. Mulvihill Aquaculture Student Scholarship, an applicant must be a United States citizen, a student member of the World Aquaculture Society and the United States Aquaculture Society (USAS) at the time of application submission, and a graduate or upper level undergraduate student.  Selection will be based upon the student's financial need, academic history, and contributions to U.S. aquaculture or the USAS and commitment to aquaculture.
  • US Aquaculture Society, a Chapter of the World Aquaculture Society, announces the newly released book entitled, "Aquaculture and the Environment in the United States", is the first book to be published by the United States Aquaculture Society, a Chapter of the World Aquaculture Society. The 277 page book contains 12 chapters describing the multi-faceted issue of environmental impacts of aquaculture effluents. This book is extremely timely considering U. S. EPA's ongoing review of aquaculture effluents. You may purchase it at the World Aquaculture Society's online store at http://www.was.org.
  • Federal Register Notice regarding changes in conservation practice standards
    in the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) National Handbook of Conservation Practices. (Ac.) CODE 397 DEFINITION-A water impoundment constructed and managed for commercial aquaculture production.
    PURPOSE-Provide a favorable aquatic environment for producing, growing, harvesting, and marketing
    commercial aquaculture crops.
    CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES-This practice applies to: 1.All impoundments that store water and are managed for commercial aquaculture purposes. 2.Embankment impoundments that do not exceed the requirements for Class (a) dams having a product of storage times effective height of dam less than 3,000 acre-ft2 and effective height of dam less than 35 feet, as defined in Conservation Practice Standard 378, Pond.
    GENERAL CRITERIA-A thorough aquaculture resource assessment shall be made to determine the feasibility of the project prior to design.  Aquaculture ponds may be: (1) embankment ponds that intercept and store surface runoff water, or (2) off channel impoundments or excavated ponds that are filled by pumping ground water, or diverting spring or stream flows.  The site must be protected from flooding, sedimentation, and non-sediment contamination.  The soils within the pond area, as well as those in the contributing drainage area, must be checked for residues of pesticides and other harmful chemicals for any possibility of contamination.  Acid soils shall be limed to achieve a neutral condition or the desired pH level for best production.  When multiple ponds are installed, each pond shall be arranged so that it can be managed independently of the others to facilitate harvesting and the control of parasites and disease.  All ponds shall be designed to minimize the escape of harmful fishery species. A protective cover of vegetation shall be established on all exposed soil surfaces that have been disturbed. If soil or climatic conditions preclude the use of vegetation, other protective measures shall be used. Water supply. Any available water source may be used if the quality and quantity are adequate.  Evaporation rates, fish-stocking densities, and species requirements shall be used in establishing specific incoming flow rates. Water Quality. Water entering the pond shall be aerated to increase dissolved oxygen and dissipate harmful gases if needed. The minimum dissolved oxygen level in ponds is 3 to 5 parts per million. Water temperature and water chemistry shall be suitable for use for fish-stocking density and species requirements in the planned aquaculture production.
    If water is pumped from rivers and streams or other sources where undesirable fish, pesticide residue, fish disease, and parasites may be introduced, filters must be installed in the pumping system. Incoming water shall be added as far away from outlet drain as possible to prevent the rapid removal of fresh water from the pond. Provisions shall be made for any needed treatment of water released downstream from the aquaculture impoundment structure. All Federal, State and local regulations will be followed and necessary permits will be obtained prior to construction and stocking. Design Criteria - Embankment Ponds. Earthfill dams and embankments around excavated ponds shall meet or exceed the requirements for embankments specified for Pond (378). The minimum top width of the embankment shall be 14 feet, where it is to be used as a road for harvesting, feeding, and management purposes and is nonpublic. Design Criteria - Excavated Ponds. Ponds established by excavating and constructing an embankment around their outer perimeter that excludes outside runoff shall have either an auxiliary spillway or have a principal spillway pipe installed with sufficient capacity to remove a 10-year/24-hour direct rainfall amount in 48 hours. A minimum 8-inch diameter pipe shall be used. Levee construction shall add the required embankment settlement to the minimum freeboard requirements. A minimum berm width of 10 feet shall be provided between the outside toe of levee and top of bank of outlet drainage ditch. Pipes and conduits. Pump discharge through levees shall be installed above expected high water level, and provisions shall be made to prevent pump and motor vibrations from being transmitted to discharge conduits. Interior embankments constructed for division of water or to direct water flow for circulation shall have adequate cross section to provide for stability and function for its intended purpose. Adequate provisions must be made to protect earth surfaces from turbulent water at pipe inlets and outlets. Pond size and depth. The pond shall be constructed to the recommended size and depth for the species to be grown. Drains. All ponds shall have facilities for complete as well as partial drawdown. Turn-down pipes, quick-release valves, bottom-water release sleeves, or other devices for water level control and pond management are to be included in the construction of the drawdown facility as appropriate. Conduit design and seepage control shall meet or exceed the requirements specified for Pond (378). Pond bottom. Where fish are harvested by seining, the pond bottom shall be smooth and free of all stumps, trees, roots, and other debris. Existing channels and depressions in the pond area shall be filled and smoothed. The edges of the pond should be deepened to provide at least 3 feet of water. Where crawfish are harvested by trapping, complete clearing and removal of trees, stumps, and other vegetation is not required. The pond bottom shall be sloped to the outlet at a gradient of at least 0.2-foot per 100 feet. Access and safety. Provisions shall be made for access to the site as well as access for operation and maintenance. Access ramps, if provided, shall have a grade for equipment access of 4 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter. Appropriate safety features shall be made available close-by to aid people who may fall into the pond and devices installed to prevent such accidents. Fences shall be installed as necessary to exclude livestock and unwanted traffic.
    CONSIDERATIONS-The State fishery agency or appropriate State University or research institution should becontacted for recommendation on pond size, water depths, and adapted commercial aquatic
    species. Consider any adverse impact to cultural resources when planning for aquaculture ponds.
    Other planning considerations include the following: 3.The visual design of ponds should be carefully considered in areas of high public visibility and those associated with recreational fishing. 4.Consider the effects on the volume of downstream flow or aquifers that might cause undesirable environmental, social, or economic effects and contribute to water table decline from heavy pumping.  5.Measures to avoid depredation by birds or other animals should be included in the design.
    PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS-Plans and specifications for constructing aquaculture ponds shall be in keeping with this standard and shall describe the site specific requirements for applying the practice to achieve its intended purpose.
    OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE-A plan for operation and maintenance shall be prepared for use by those responsible for the system. This plan shall provide for inspection, operation, and maintenance of vegetation, pipes, valves, spillways, roads, and other parts of the system.

    Federal Register: October 2, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 191)] [Notices] [Page 61848] From
    the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr02oc02-31]

    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Notice of Proposed Changes in the National Handbook of Conservation Practices
    AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
    ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
    EFFECTIVE DATES: Comments will be received on or before November 1, 2002. This
    series of new or revised conservation practice standards will be adopted after the close of the
    30-day period.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Single copies of these standards are
    available from NRCS-CED in Washington, DC. Submit individual inquiries and return any
    comments in writing to William Hughey, National Agricultural Engineer, Natural Resources
    Conservation Service, Post Office Box 2890, Room 6139-S, Washington, DC. 20013-2890.
    The telephone number is (202) 720-5023. The standards are also available, and can be
    downloaded from the Internet at: http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/ practice--stds.html.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement
    and Reform Act of 1996 requires NRCS to make available, for public review and comment,
    proposed revisions to conservation practice standards used to carry out the highly erodible land
    and wetland provisions of the law. For the next 30 days, NRCS will receive comments on the
    proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made by NRCS regarding
    disposition of those comments, and a final determination of change will be made. Signed in
    Washington, DC, on September 20, 2002. Bruce I. Knight, Chief, Natural Resources
    Conservation Service. [FR Doc. 02-24963 Filed 10-1-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE
    3410-16-P
     

September

  • EPA Proposes Effluent Guidelines for Aquaculture Facilities EPA presented the proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for wastewater discharges from the concentrated aquatic animal production industrial point source category. The proposed regulation introduces new technology-based effluent limitations guidelines and standards for wastewater discharges associated with the operation of new and existing concentrated aquatic animal production facilities (CAAP). CAAP includes fish hatcheries, fin fish farms, shellfish farms, and some aquariums and botanical gardens. The proposed rule would only apply to operations with flow-through systems, recirculating systems, and net pens. Treatment techniques contained in the proposal would address issues such as feed management to minimize excess food in the water, health management to reduce disease and the use of drugs, and drug and chemical management plans that include conditions for storage. Comments on the proposal must be postmarked by December 11, 2002. EPA will conduct two or three public meetings to discuss the proposed rule. The information on dates, times and locations of the public meetings will be published in a subsequent Federal Register notice.
  • Representatives from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)will visit area catfish farms in early 2003 to conduct a survey for  Catfish 2003, a study of health and health management practices on U.S. catfish production sites.  Conducted by the USDA's National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS), Catfish 2003 will address priority issues of the U.S. Catfish industry.  The Catfish 2003 study will be NAHMS' second national study of the catfish industry. The first, Catfish '97, described and evaluated the general health and management practices of the foodsize fish component of the industry.  Objectives of the Catfish 2003 study include:
    •  Investigate foodsize fish production practices
    • Investigate fingerling production practices, specifically, broodstock management, hatchery management, vaccination practices, fingerling pond management, fingerling stocking, and feeding practices.
    • Study the prevalence of disease problems in foodsize fish and fingerlings as reported by producers
    • Examine off-flavor problems.

    In early 2003, data collectors from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) will conduct personal interviews with producers in the four primary catfish production States (Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi). For more information on Catfish 2003, see: WHAT'S NEW or AQUACULTURE at the following website: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ceah/cahm

August

June

January