|
EDF Report Details
Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture Industry
(30 October 1997 New York) The
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) today announced the release of "Murky Waters: The
Environmental Effects of Aquaculture in the United States," a report detailing
environmental degradation caused by the $729 million US fish farming industry as well as
strategies and technologies available to make fish farming environmentally sound.
"Most people would be surprised to discover that their last seafood meal may have
been raised on a farm, not caught at sea," said Dr Rebecca Goldburg, lead author of
the report. "Fish and shellfish are now farmed in every state and US territory, and
aquaculture is the fastest growing segment of US agriculture. Consumers should be aware of
the potential environmental problems resulting from aquaculture before their next trip to
the grocery store."
Declines in many wild fish populations and growing demand for seafood have made
aquaculture the source of an increasing percentage of seafood in the US and throughout the
world. Although precise figures are not available, virtually all the catfish and rainbow
trout, roughly half the shrimp, and approximately one third of the salmon consumed in this
country are raised by fish farmers. About 25% of all the fish consumed by humans worldwide
is now farmed.
Unfortunately, the growth of the fish farming industry has often come at a price to the
environment. Most large US fish farms are aquatic feedlots. Similar to other forms of
intensive animal production, such as hog and poultry farms, they can produce large
quantities of polluting wastes. Unlike wastes from terrestrial feedlots, however,
aquaculture wastes are often directly released to natural bodies of water. These wastes
have the potential to contribute to current problems from nutrient pollution, such as
recent outbreaks of the toxic microbe Pfeisteria, which some expects believe are linked to
wastes from hog and poultry farms.
Aquaculture is often promoted as a way to reduce over-fishing, but aquaculture can
actually result in a net loss of fish protein. Many farmed fish, such as salmon, trout,
and shrimp, are wholly or partly carnivorous. Feeding them can require catching more fish
from the ocean than are ultimately produced on the farms. "Farming carnivores such as
salmon is a bit like farming tigers," said Goldburg. "About three to five pounds
of wild fish are required to produce one pound of farmed salmon."
"Aquaculture need not harm the environment, however, and some forms of fish farming
are inherently less polluting than others," said Goldburg. "For example, farming
of filter-feeders such as clams, oysters, and other mollusks actually cleans the water.
Farming of herbivorous fish such as catfish does not result in a net loss of fish protein
because feed for these fish is largely made from soybeans and other crops. Moreover, there
arc a number of technologies and practices now being used by some fish farmers that reduce
or even eliminate environmental problems caused by Aquaculture."
The Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national, NY-based nonprofit organization,
represents 300,000 members. EDF links science, economics, and law to create innovative,
economically viable solutions to today's environmental problems.
|